Kako je TikTok #medreligijski?

Induktivna tematska analiza

Avtorji

  • Aída Velasco Morla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2024.465

Ključne besede:

medreligijski, medverski, TikTok, tematska analiza, raznovrstnost

Povzetek

Avtorica v raziskavi preučuje, kako TikTok omogoča svojim uporabnikom izražanje in izmenjevanje medreligijskih praks ter sodelovanje v njih, pri čemer poudarja sožitje različnih verskih tradicij. Ustvarjalci na tej platformi predstavljajo prizore vsakodnevnega sobivanja, medverske dogodke in mešane obrede, obenem pa razkrivajo diskriminacijo in neodobravanje, povezano z medverskimi odnosi. Na podlagi induktivne tematske analize vsebin je avtorica opredelila tri glavne teme: medverske čustvene odnose (67,9 %), medreligijske izkušnje (21,8 %) ter medreligijska dejstva in informacije (10,3 %).

Raziskava kaže, da TikTok deluje kot prostor za samopredstavitev in medreligijsko povezovanje prek ključnikov #medreligijski in #medverski, s čimer presega vlogo zgolj odmevne komore in povečuje prepoznavnost medreligijskih vsebin. Ustvarjanje verskih vsebin na TikToku materializira vero in širi interakcijo med posameznikom, skupnostjo in Svetim v globalno okolje, kjer se verske prakse izmenjujejo in na novo tolmačijo.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Abidin, Crystal. “Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours.” Cultural Science Journal 12, no. 1 (2021): 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2006): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, no. 3 (2020): 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.

Byrne, David. “A Worked Example of Braun and Clarke’s Approach to Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Quality & Quantity 56 (2022): 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y.

Campbell, Heidi A. “Religion and the Internet: A Microcosm for Studying Internet Trends and Implications.” New Media & Society 15, no. 5 (2013): 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462848.

Civila, Sabina, Mónica Bonilla-del-Rio, and Ignacio Aguaded. “Social Media and Otherness: The Case of #Islamterrorism on TikTok. “Politics and Governance 11, no. 2 (2023): 114-126. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6299.

Datareportal. “Global Digital Insights.” Accesed April 5, 2024. https://datareportal.com/.

Dicks, Bella. “Multimodal Analysis.” In Sage Research Methods Foundations, edited by Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W. Sakshaug, and Richard A. Williams. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2019. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831970.

Eddy, Kirsten. “How Young People Consume News and the Implications for Mainstream Media.” Reuters Institute. 2022. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/how-young-people-consume-news-and-implications-mainstream-media.

Eysenbach, Gunther, and James E. Till. “Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research on Internet Communities.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 323 (2001): 1103–1105.

Fannin, Rebecca. “The Strategy Behind TikTok’s Global Rise.” Harvard Business Review, September 11, 2019. https://hbr.org/2019/09/the-strategy-behind-tiktoks-global-rise.

Hamm, Margaret, and Kate Hoeting. “#ChristianCheck: TikTok and the Construction of Generation Z Faith.” Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture 12, no. 1 (2023): 5–29.

Herrick, Shannon S. C., Laura Hallward, and Lindsay R. Duncan. “This Is Just How I Cope: An Inductive Thematic Analysis of Eating Disorder Recovery Content Created and Shared on TikTok Using #EDrecovery.” International Journal of Eating Disorders 54, no. 4 (2020): 516-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23463.

Hollenbaugh, Erin E. “Self-Presentation in Social Media: Review and Research Opportunities.” Review of Communication Research 9 (2021): 80-98.

Marynak, Kristy L., Meagan O. Robichaud, Tyler Puryear, Ryan D. Kennedy, and Meghan B. Moran. “#Nicotineaddiction on TikTok: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Top-Viewed Posts.” Tobacco Induced Diseases 20, no. 69 (2022): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/151868.

Masur, Philipp K., DiFranzo, Dominic, and Natalya N. Bazarova. “Behavioral Contagion on Social Media: Effects of Social Norms, Design Interventions, and Critical Media Literacy on Self-Disclosure.” PLoS ONE 16, no. 7 (2021): e0254670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254670.

Miller, Chris. “How Modern Witches Enchant TikTok: Intersections of Digital, Consumer, and Material Culture(s) on #WitchTok.” Religions 13, no. 2 (2022): 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020118.

Morgan, David. “The Material Culture of Lived Religions: Visuality and Embodiment.” Originally published in Mind and Matter: Selected Papers of Nordic Conference 2009. Studies in Art History, vol. 41. Helsinki: Society of Art History, 2010. Republished in The Jugaad Project, July 7, 2019. https://www.thejugaadproject.pub/home/the-material-culture-of-lived-religions-visuality-and-embodiment.

Neumaier, Anna, and Gritt Klinkhammer. Interreligious contact and media: introduction, Religions 50, no. 3 (2020): 321-335.

Statista. “Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2024, by number of monthly active users.” Accessed May 1, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/.

Zhao, Hongying, and Christian Wagner. “How TikTok leads users to flow experience: Investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators.” Internet Research 33, no. 2 (2022): 820-849. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2021-0595.

Zhao, Zhengwei. “Analysis on the ‘Douyin (Tiktok) Mania Phenomenon Based on Recommendation Algorithms.” E3S Web of Conferences, February 3, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123503029.

Prenosi

Objavljeno

2024-12-24

Kako citirati

Velasco Morla, Aída. 2024. „Kako Je TikTok #medreligijski? : Induktivna Tematska Analiza“. Poligrafi 29 (113/114):77-107. https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2024.465.

Številka

Letn. 29 Št. 113/114 (2024): Material Religion and the Digital

Rubrike

Članki

Licenca

Avtorske pravice (c) 2024 Aída Velasco Morla

Creative Commons licenca

To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.

Revija omogoča takojšen odprt dostop do svojih vsebin na podlagi načela, da prost dostop javnosti do rezultatov raziskav spodbuja večjo globalno izmenjavo znanja. Uporabniki lahko berejo, prenašajo, kopirajo, razširjajo, tiskajo, iščejo po ali povezujejo do celotnih besedil člankov ali jih uporabljajo za kakršenkoli drug zakonit namen, ne da bi za to morali pridobiti predhodno dovoljenje založnika ali avtorja.

Z oddajo prispevka se avtorji strinjajo z naslednjimi pogoji:

  1. Avtorji obdržijo avtorske pravice in reviji podelijo pravico do prve objave, pri čemer je delo licencirano v skladu s pogoji licence Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva (CC BY 4.0), ki drugim omogoča delitev dela pod pogojem, da se navede avtorstvo dela in njegova prvotna objava v tej reviji.
  2. Avtorji izdajatelju podeljujejo komercialne pravice za izdajo tiskanih izvodov revije, namenjenih prodaji knjižnicam in posameznikom.
  3. Avtorji lahko sklenejo ločene, dodatne pogodbene dogovore o neizključni distribuciji objavljene različice dela v tej reviji (npr. objavo v institucionalnem repozitoriju ali v knjigi), pri čemer morajo navesti, da je bilo delo prvotno objavljeno v tej reviji.
  4. Vsi članki so shranjeni v Digitalnem repozitoriju slovenskih raziskovalnih organizacij (DiRROS) pod licenco Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna (CC BY 4.0) in digitalni knjižnici slovenske nacionalne knjižnice NUK, dLib.