Verjetnost naložitve uma
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2025.519Ključne besede:
naložitev uma, filozofija uma, dualizem, funkcionalizem, biološki vidiki človeškega uma, fenomenologija telesa in umaPovzetek
Predmet članka je verjetnost naložitve človeškega uma na nebiološki digitalni nosilec. Zamisel naložitve uma je dobila močen zagon zaradi napredka na področju digitalizacije in umetne inteligence. Vprašanje verjetnosti naložitve uma je zelo relevantno za teologijo in religijo, saj obravnava ključna teološka vprašanja. Nedvomno je naložitev uma v napetosti s tistimi (religioznimi in teološkimi) pogledi, ki človeka oziroma človeško osebo razumejo kot neločljivo enotnost duha in telesa. Zato je treba naložitev uma raziskati z vidika teologij. Avtor se ukvarja s filozofskimi vprašanji naložitve uma, ki pa so zelo pomembna tudi za teologijo. V članku predstavi in kritično premisli temeljni predpostavki naložitve uma, dualizem in funkcionalizem, in številne argumente proti verjetnosti naložitve uma, med drugimi argumente na podlagi bioloških omejitev zavesti, fenomenološkega vidika utelešenja, dejavnega vidika zavesti, pomena telesnega modela za identiteto ter vloge telesa v naši družbeni vpetosti, odnosih in življenju. Veliko pozornosti posveti pojasnitvi pomembnosti (živetega) telesa. Težko je videti, kako bi ga lahko nadomestil nebiološki digitalni substrat. V sklepu ugotavlja, da je verjetnost naložitve uma znanstveno in filozofsko zelo vprašljiva. Glede na razpoložljivo evidenco lahko utemeljeno zagovarjamo stališče, da je človeški um bistveno odvisen od svojih bioloških in telesnih vidikov, zato ga ni mogoče reproducirati na nebioloških digitalnih substratih.
Prenosi
Literatura
Blackmore, Susan. Conversations on Consciousness: What the Best Minds Think About the Brain, Free Will, and What It Means to Be Human. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Bostrom, Nick. “Transhumanist Values.” Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Issue Supplement) (2005): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2005_26.
Bostrom, Nick. “The Future of Humanity.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, edited by Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan Selinger, and Søren Riis, 186–216. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Bostrom, Nick, and Rebecca Roache. “Ethical Issues in Human Enhancement.” In New Waves in Applied Ethics, edited by Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen, and Clark Wolf, 120–52. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Centa Strahovnik, Mateja. “Identiteta in pogovorni sistemi umetne inteligence [Identity and Conversational Artificial Intelligence].” Bogoslovni vestnik/Theological Quarterly 83, no. 4 (2023): 853–864. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2023/04/Centa.
Chalmers, David J. “The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis.” In Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence, edited by Susan Schneider, 171–224. Chichester, UK: Wiley‑Blackwell, 2010.
Churcher, Millicent. “Can Empathy Be a Moral Resource? A Smithean Reply to Jesse Prinz.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 55, no. 3 (2016): 429–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217316000688.
Damasio, Antonio R. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt, 1999.
De Preester, Helena. “Technology and the Body: (Im)Possibilities of Re-Embodiment.” Foundations of Science 16 (2011): 119–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9188-5.
Dittrich, Tristan Samuel. “Transhumanistische Glückstreben und christliche Heilshoffnung: Ein Vergleich.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Philosophie 143, no. 3 (2021): 452–474. https://doi.org/10.35070/ztp.v143i3.3677.
Eden, Amnon H., James H. Moor, Johnny H. Søraker, and Eric Steinhart, eds. Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
Fuchs, Thomas. “Feelings of Being Alive: Organic Foundations of Self-Awareness.” In Feelings of Being Alive, edited by Jörg Fingerhut and Sabine Marienberg, 149–66. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
Fuchs, Thomas. In Defense of the Human Being: Foundational Questions of an Embodied Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Gallagher, Shaun. “Lived Body and Environment.” Research in Phenomenology 16, no. 1 (1986): 139–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916486X00103.
Gasser, Georg. “Leibliche Existenz und die Vision des Mind-Uploading.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Philosophie 143, no. 3 (2021): 365–87. https://doi.org/10.35070/ztp.v143i3.3753.
Globokar, Roman. “Pogled Katoliške Cerkve na razvoj in uporabo umetne inteligence [The Catholic Church’s View on the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence].” Bogoslovni vestnik/Theological Quarterly 84, no. 4 (2024): 867—883. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2024/04/Globokar.
Griffero, Tonino. Being a Lived Body: From a Neo-Phenomenological Point of View. Abingdon: Routledge, 2023.
Isern-Mas, Carme, and Antoni Gomila. “Por qué la empatía es importante para la moralidad?” Análisis Filosófico 29, no. 1 (May 2019): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2019.310.
Klun, Branko. “Problem religioznega izkustva v digitalno transformiranem svetu: Eksistencialno fenomenološki pristop [The Problem of Religious Experience in a Digitally Transformed World: An Existential-Phenomenological Approach].” Bogoslovni vestnik/Theological Quarterly 84, no. 1 (2024): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2024/01/Klun.
Krauss, Kerstin. Ethik der Empathie: Eine Grundlegung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2023.
Lee, Newton, ed. The Transhumanism Handbook. Cham: Springer, 2019.
Levin, Janet. “Functionalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Accessed May 4, 2025. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/functionalism/.
Mercer, Calvin, and Tracy J. Trothen. Religion and the Technological Future: An Introduction to Biohacking, Artificial Intelligence, and Transhumanism. Cham: Springer, 2021.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962.
Müller, Tobias. “Künstliche Intelligenz und menschliches Selbstverständnis. Zu anthropologischen Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Philosophie 143, no. 3 (2021): 341–64. https://doi.org/10.35070/ztp.v143i3.3749.
Nagel, Thomas. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review 83, no. 4 (October 1974): 435–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.
O’Connell, Mark. To Be a Machine: Adventures Among Cyborgs, Utopians, Hackers, and the Futurists Solving the Modest Problem of Death. New York: Doubleday, 2017.
Osler, Lucy. “Taking empathy online.” Inquiry 67, no. 1 (2021): 302–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1899045.
Ottinger, Richard. “Körperliche Leiblichkeit als Bedingung der Erfahrungsmöglichkeit von Authentizität: Walter Benjamins Begriff der Aura, (Neue) Phänomenologie und digitale Mediatisierung.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Philosophie 143, no. 3 (2021): 388–404. https://doi.org/10.35070/ztp.v143i3.3667.
Passos-Ferreira, Claudia. “In Defense of Empathy: A Response to Prinz.” Abstracta 8, no. 2 (2015): 31–35. https://doi.org/10.24338/abs-2015.216.
Petkovšek, Robert, and Bojan Žalec, eds. Transhumanism as a Challenge for Ethics and Religion. Vienna and Zürich: Lit, 2021.
Pigliucci, Massimo. “Mind Uploading: A Philosophical Counter-Analysis.” In Intelligence Unbound: The Future of Uploaded and Machine Minds, edited by Russell Blackford and Damien Broderick, 119–130. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.
Platovnjak, Ivan, and Tone Svetelj. “Artificial Intelligence and Imago Dei: A New Dilemma for Philosophical and Theological Anthropology.” Bogoslovni vestnik/Theological Quarterly 84, no. 4 (2024): 835–846. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2024/04/Platovnjak.
Polger, Thomas W. “Functionalism as a Philosophical Theory of the Cognitive Sciences.” WIREs Cognitive Science 3, no. 3 (May/June 2012): 337–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1170.
Prinz, Jesse J. “Is Empathy Necessary for Morality?” In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, edited by Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie, 211–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Ranisch, Robert, and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner, eds. Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2014.
Robinson, Howard. “Dualism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Accessed May 4, 2025. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/dualism/.
Schmitz, Hermann. Der Leib. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2011.
Searle, John R. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no. 3 (1980): 414–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756.
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. “The Lived Body.” The Humanistic Psychologist 18, no. 2 (1990): 115–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/HUM0000150.
Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz. On Transhumanism. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2020.
Schmetkamp, Susanne. Theorien der Empathie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius, 2024.
Schulze-Makuch, Dirk, and Louis N. Irwin. Life in the Universe: Expectations and Constraints. Berlin: Springer, 2004.
Stegu, Tadej. “Antropološki izzivi kateheze v času umetne inteligence [Anthropological Challenges of Catechesis in the Age of Artificial Intelligence].” Bogoslovni vestnik/Theological Quarterly 84, no. 4 (2024): 909–919. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2024/04/Stegu.
Stein, Edith. Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, vol. 5. Freiburg: Herder, 2010.
Sturm, Wilfried. “Transhumanismus und Digitalisierung: Theologisch-anthropologische Perspektiven.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Philosophie 143, no. 3 (2021): 425–51. https://doi.org/10.35070/ztp.v143i3.3717.
“Teleportacija – znanstvena fantastika ali realnost,” series Ugriznimo znanost, TV Slovenija 1, December 5, 2024. Accessed December 9, 2024. https://www.rtvslo.si/rtv365/arhiv/175091690?s=tv.
Van Gulick, Robert. “Functionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann, and Sven Walter, 128–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Turner, Kevin J. “Phenomenological Dimensions of Body in the Zhuangzi.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 23 (September 2024): 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-024-09959-2.
Wheeler, Michael. “Mind in Life or Life in Mind? Making Sense of Deep Continuity.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 18, no. 5-6 (2011): 148–167. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11393.
Žalec, Bojan. Človečnost v digitalni dobi: izzivi umetne inteligence, transhumanizma in genetike [Humanity in the Digital Age: The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism, and Genetics]. Ljubljana: Teološka fakulteta, 2023. https://www.teof.uni-lj.si/uploads/Zalozba/ZnK86-Zalec-clovecnost_elektronska.pdf.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2025 Bojan Žalec
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Open Access Policy and Copyright
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
