Empatija med telesnostjo in digitalno depersonalizacijo: filozofski in psihološki vidiki
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2025.511Ključne besede:
empatija, digitalno sporazumevanje, depersonalizacija, utelešenost, medosebni odnosiPovzetek
Empatija kot zmožnost razumevanja in deljenja občutij drugega se tradicionalno razume kot temeljni kamen medosebnih odnosov in družbene kohezije. Vendar pa se v dobi digitalnega sporazumevanja in vse večje virtualizacije interakcij pojavljajo pomembna vprašanja o naravi, izrazu in vplivu empatije. Z razvojem digitalne tehnologije in razširjenostjo spleta se spreminjajo načini medsebojnega povezovanja in sporazumevanja, pri katerih telesni vidik izginja. Čeprav digitalna orodja omogočajo hitro in učinkovito vzpostavljanje stikov, se porajajo pomisleki o vplivu teh oblik sporazumevanja na kakovost medosebnih odnosov. Digitalno sporazumevanje je pogosto besedilno, asinhrono in velikokrat anonimno, kar zmanjšuje prisotnost telesnih in družbenih znakov, ki so bistveni za klasično empatično izkušnjo. Ob upoštevanju tega razprava o empatiji v kontekstu digitalne depersonalizacije zahteva celosten pristop, ki zajema filozofske, psihološke in druge vidike. V prispevku bomo obravnavali izzive empatije, ki temelji na telesnosti in neposrednem medčloveškem stiku, ti temelji pa so pri digitalnem sporazumevanju pogosto okrnjeni ali popolnoma odsotni. Prav ta odsotnost zmanjšuje možnost polne empatične izkušnje in spodbuja pojav depersonalizacije.
Prenosi
Literatura
Bauer, Joachim. Warum ich fühle, was du fühlst. Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe Verlag, 2006.
Bloom, Paul. Against Empathy. London: Vintage, 2016.
Borden, Sarah. Edith Stein. London: Continuum, 2003.
Ciaunica, Anna. “The ‘Meeting of Bodies’: Empathy and basic forms of shared experiences.” Topoi 38 (August 2019): 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9500-x.
Decety, Jean, and Claire Holvoet. “The emergence of empathy: A developmental neuroscience perspective.” Developmental Review 62 (December 2021): 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100999.
DeYoung, Patricia. Relational Psychotherapy: A Primer. New York: Brunner-Routledge, 2003.
Eddy, Anneli. “Is technology killing human emotion? How computer-mediated communication compares to face-to-face interactions.” Mensch und Computer (2019): 527–530. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3344451.
Fuchs, Thomas, and Sabine C. Koch. “Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved.” Frontiers in Psychology 5 (June 2014): 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508.
Fuchs, Thomas. “Levels of empathy—Primary, extended, and reiterated empathy.” In Empathy: Epistemic Problems and Cultural-historical Perspectives of a Cross-disciplinary Concept, edited by Vanessa Lux and Sigrid Weigel, 27–47. London: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature, 2017.
Gallagher, Shaun. “Empathy, simulation, and narrative.” Science in Context 25, no. 3 (2012): 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889712000117.
Gallese, Vittorio. “The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity.” Psychopathology 36, no. 4 (2003): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000072786.
Genzer, Shir, Yoad Ben Adiva, and Anat Perry. Empathy: From Perception to Understanding and Feeling Others’ Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Gumbrecht, Hans Urlich. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.
Hribar Sorčan, Valentina. “O empatiji in intersubjektivnosti.” Anthropos 1–2, no. 209–210 (2008): 11–25.
Klun, Branko. “Problem religioznega izkustva v digitalno transformiranem svetu: eksistencialno fenomenološki pristop.” Bogoslovni vestnik 84, no. 1 (2024): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2024/01/Klun.
Lamovec, Tanja. “Empatija.” Anthropos 17, no. 5/6 (1987): 233–245.
Laura, Samuel, and Fraser Douglas Hannam. “The technologisation of education and the pathway to depersonalisation and dehumanisation.” Asian Journal of Social Science Studies 2, no. 2 (2017): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v2i2.155.
Márquez-Hernández, Veronica, Lorena Gutiérrez-Puertas, Genoveva Granados-Gámez, Vanesa Gutiérrez-Puertas, and Gabriel Aguilera-Manrique. “Problematic mobile phone use, nomophobia and decision-making in nursing students mobile and decision-making in nursing students.” Nurse Education in Practice 49 (November 2020): 102910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102910.
Marson, Fabio, Revital Naor-Ziv, Patrizio Paoletti, Joseph Glicksohn, Tadhg Harris, Mark A Elliott, Filippo Carducci, and Tal Dotan Ben-Soussan. “When the body fosters empathy: The interconnectivity between bodily reactivity, meditation, and embodied abstract concepts.” Progress in Brain Research 287 (2024): 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.004.
Meltzoff, Andrew N., and Keith M. Moore. “Infant intersubjectivity: Broadening the dialogue to include imitation, identity and intention.” In Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny, edited by Stein Bråten, 47–62. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge, 1974.
Preston, Stephanie D., and Frans B. M. de Waal. “Empathy. Its ulitimate and proximate bases.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25, no. 1 (2002): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02000018.
Primack, Brian A., Ariel Shensa, Jaime E. Sidani, Erin O. Whaite, Liu Yi Lin, Daniel Rosen, Jason B. Colditz, Ana Radovic, and Elizabeth Miller. “Social Media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 53, no. 1 (2017): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010.
Rørstad Torbjørnsen, Regine, and Inês Hipólito, “Widening the screen: embodied cognition and audiovisual online social interaction in the digital age.” AI & Society 40, no. 1 (2025): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01844-5.
Shlien, John. “Empathy in psychotherapy: A vital mechanism? Yes. Therapist’s conceit? All too often. By itself enough? No.” In Empathy Reconsidered: New Directions in Psychotherapy, edited by Arthur C. Bohart and Leslie S. Greenberg, 63–80. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1997.
Simonič, Barbara. “Dialoške razsežnosti empatije pri Edith Stein.” Edinost in dialog 75, no. 2 (2020), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.34291/Edinost/75/02/Simonic.
Simonič, Barbara. Empatija. Ljubljana: Brat Frančišek in Franiškanski družinski inštitut, 2010.
Solomon, Marion F. “Countertransference and empathy in couples therapy.” In Countertransference in Couples Therapy, edited by Marion F. Solomon and Judith P. Siegel, 23–37. New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 1997.
Stein, Edith. On the Problem of Empathy. Washington: ICS Publications, 1989.
Stern, Daniel N. The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: W. W. Nornton & Company, 2004.
Stern, Daniel. The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books, 1985.
Stueber, Karsten R. Rediscovering Empathy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006.
Surguladze, Simon, and Dessa Bergen-Cico, “Editorial: Empathy in a broader context: Development, mechanisms, remediation.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 11 (2020): 529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00529.
Tangeny, June, and Ronda L. Dearing. Shame and Guilt. New York: Guilford Press, 2002.
Tavares, Maria, and Ben Rein. “The virtual disengagement hypothesis: A neurophysiological framework for reduced empathy on social media.” Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 24, no. 6 (2024): 965–971. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01212-w.
Trevarthen, Colwyn. “The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity.” In Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny, edited by Stein Bråten, 15–46. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Trevarthen, Colwyn. “The self born in intersubjectivity: The psychology of an infant communicating.” In The Perceived Self. Ecological and Interpersonal Sources of Self-knowledge, edited by Urlic Neisser, 121–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books, 2011.
Verducci, Susan. “A conceptual history of empathy and a question it raises from moral education.” Educational Theory 50, no. 1 (2000): 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2000.00063.x.
Warner, Margaret S. “Does empathy cure? A theoretical consideration of empathy, processing, and personal narrative.” In Empathy Reconsidered: New Directions in Psychotherapy, edited by Arthur C. Bohart and Leslie S. Greenberg, 125–140. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1997.
Wispé, Lauren. “History of the concept of empathy.” In Empathy and its Development, edited by Nancy Eisenberg and Janet Strayer, 17–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Zahavi, Dan. “Empathy, embodiment and interpersonal understanding: From Lipps to Schutz.” Inquiry 53, no. 3 (2010): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201741003784663.
Zahavi, Dan. Self and Other. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Žalec, Bojan. “Ali je umetna inteligenca inteligenca v pravem pomenu besede? Vprašanje psihičnih značilnosti in splošnosti.” Bogoslovni vestnik 83, no. 4 (2023): 813–823. https://doi.org/10.34291/BV2023/04/Zalec.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2025 Barbara Simonič
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Open Access Policy and Copyright
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
