Ontological (In)Security and the Kurdish Issue in Turkey: The Use of Security Discourse (1925‒1984)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2021.274Keywords:
ontological (in)security, the Kurdish issue, security discourse, securitization, TurkeyAbstract
How could one account for the discourse of security used by the Turkish state considering the Kurdish issue before 1984, when the terrorist attacks of the Partiya Karkaren Kurdistani (PKK) had not yet started, and hence there was no physical security threat against the state? This article aims to answer this question from the perspective of ontological (in)security. Based on Critical Discourse Analysis of state discourse, the article argues that the political, social and cultural traits of Kurdish identity created uncertainty in the Turkish self after the Sheikh Said rebellion in 1925. Tribal/religious structures that were influential among Kurds and the expression of Kurdishness as a distinct identity disrupted the autobiographical narratives about Turkishness, hence generating ontological insecurity for the Turkish state. To overcome this problem, the state relied on security discourse and securitized the traits of Kurdish identity, by which it felt threatened. As a result of this securitization, the state was able to legitimize the extraordinary measures taken against Kurds, such as forced resettlements. Securitization, in this sense, regenerated ontological security for the state, because the extraordinary measures served to suppress the Kurdish identity that threatened the certainty and continuity of the Turkish self.
References
Sayılı İskan Kanuna Kanuna Ek Kanun [Additional Law to the Resettlement Law no. 2510], no. 105 (October 1960).
Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri I-III. Ankara: Divan Yayıncılık, 2006.
Azak, Umut. Türkiye’de Laiklik ve İslam [Secularism and Islam in Turkey]. İstanbul: İletişim, 2019.
Balaban, Gökçe. “Tracing’s Turkey’s Security Discourses and Practices vis-à-vis the Kurdish Issue.” PhD diss., Missle East Technical University, 2016.
Bayrak, Mehmet. Şark Islahat Planı: Kürtlere Vurulan Kelepçe [Reform Report for the East: Handcuff to Kurds]. İstanbul: Özge Yayınları, 2009.
Bazı Eşhasın Şark Menatıkından Garp Vilayetlerine Nakline Dair Kanun [Law regarding the transfer of certain persons from the eastern regions to the western provinces], no. 1097. In TBMM, Zabıt Ceridesi [Turkish Grand Assembly, Minutes of Debates], Vol. 33, Session 76 (June 1927), 155‒159.
Bruinessen, Martin van. “Kurdish Society, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Refugee Problems.” In The Kurds: A Contemporary Overview, edited by Philip G. Kreyenbroek and Stefan Sperl, 33‒67. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Bruinessen, Martin van. Kürtlük, Türklük, Alevilik: Etnik ve Dinsel Kimlik Mücadeleleri [Kurdishness, Turkishness and Alevism: Ethnic and Religious Identity Struggles]. Translated by Hakan Yurdakul. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2000.
Cağaptay, Soner. Islam, Secularism and Nationalism in Modern Turkey: Who Is a Turk. Oxon: Routledge, 2006.
Cağlayan, Ercan. Cumhuriyet’in Diyarbakır’da Kimlik İnşası (1923‒1950) [The Identity Construction of the Republic in Diyarbakır 1923‒1950)]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2014.
Croft, Stuart. “Constructing Ontological insecurity: The Insecuritization of Britian’s Muslims.” Contemporary Security Policy 32, no. 2 (June 2012): 219‒235.
Delehanty, K. Will and Brent J. Steele. “Engaging the Narrative in Ontological (In)Security Theory: Insights from Feminist IR.” Cambridge Review of International Studies 22, no. 3 (September 2009): 523‒540.
Ekinci, Ziya Tarık. Türkiye İşçi Partisi ve Kürtler [Turkish Workers’ Party and Kurds]. İstanbul: Sosyal Tarih Yayınları, 2010.
Giddens, Anthony. The Consequences of Modernity. London: Standford University Press, 1990.
Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. London: Standford University Press, 1991.
Gökalp, Ziya. The Principles of Turkism. (n.p.): Bill Archive, 1968.
Huysmans, Jef. “Security! What Do You Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier.” European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 2 (June 1998): 226‒255.
Hür, Ayşe. “Kımıl’ Olayından 49’lar Davası’na.” HakSöz Haber, July 13, 2008. https://www.haksozhaber.net/kimil-olayindan-49lar-davasina-6614yy.htm.
İskân Kanunu [Resettlement Law], no. 2510. Düstur [Code of Laws], Third Set, vol. 15 (June 1934), 1156–1175.
Jwaideh, Wadie. Kürt Milliyetçiliği’nin Tarihi: Kökenleri ve Gelişimi [The Kurdish National Movement: Its Origins and Development]. Translated by İsmail Çekem and Alper Duman. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1999.
Kaygusuz, Özlem. “Modern Türk Vatandaşlığı Kavramının Erken Öncülleri: Milli Mücadele Döneminde Ulusal Vatandaşlığın Kuruluşu [The Early Antecedents of Modern Turkish Citizenship: The Construction of National Citizenship in National Struggle].” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 60, no. 2 (2005): 195‒217.
Keyman, Fuat and Umut Özkırımlı “The ‘Kurdish Question’ revisited: Modernity, Nationalism and Citizenship in Turkey.” In Understanding Turkey’s Kurdish Question, edited by Fevzi Bilgin and Ali Sarıhan. Lanham: Lexington Books, 1997.
Kotan, Mümtaz. Yenilginin İzdüşümleri [Footprints of Defeat]. Atina: Yunan Kürt Dostluk Derneği Yayınları, 2003.
Krolikowski, Alanna. “State Personhood in Ontological Security Theories of International Relations and Chinese Nationalism: A Skeptical View.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 1 (July 2008): 109‒133.
“Kürt Meselesi’nin Tarihi ile Yüzleşmek: DDKO Dava Dosyası’nda Türk Milliyetçiliği-Irkçılığı [Confronting History of the Kurdish Issue: Turkish Nationalism in DDKO Case File].” Toplum ve Kuram 2 (2009): 239‒246.
Laing, Ronald David. The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. London: Penguin Books, 1990.
Leeuwen, V. Theo. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Lupovici, Amir. “Ontological Dissonance, Clashing Identities, and Israel’s Unilateral Steps towards the Palestinians.” Review of International Studies 38, no. 4 (October 2012): 809‒833.
McCarus, Ernest. “Kurdish Language Studies.” Middle East Journal 14, no. 3 (Summer 1960): 325‒335.
McDowall, David. A Modern History of the Kurds. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd., 2007.
Minorsky, Vladimir. “Kurds and Kurdistan.” In Encylopedia of Islam, Vol. 5, edited by Clifford Edmund Bosworth, Van Donzel, B. Lewis, CH. Pellat, 438–486. Leiden: E. J: Brill, 1986.
Mitzen, Jennifer. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations, 12, no. 3 (September 2006): 341‒353.
Mülga Türk Ceza Kanunu [Abolished Turkish Penal Code], no. 765, Article 125 (March 1926).
Özcan, Gencer, “Türkiye’de Milli Güvenlik Kavramının Gelişimi” [The Development of the Concept of National Security in Turkey]. In Türkiye’de Ordu, Devlet ve Güvenlik Siyaseti [Military, State and Security Politics in Turkey], edited by İsmet Akça and Evren Balta Paker 307‒351. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2010.
Parla, Taha and Andrew Davison. Corporatist Ideology in Kemalist Turkey: Progress or Order?. New York: Syracuse University Press, 2004.
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge, 2011.
Rumelili, Bahar. Conflict Resolurion and Ontological Security: Peace anxieties. Oxon: Routledge, 2015.
Steele, J. Brent. “Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British and the American Civil War.” Review of International Studies 31, no. 3 (July 2005): 519‒540.
Steele, J. Brent. Ontological Security in International Relations. London: Routledge, 2008.
Subotic, Jelena. “Narrative, Ontological Security and Foreign Policy Change.” Foreign Policy Analysis 12, no. 4 (October 2016): 610‒627.
TBMM Zabıt Ceridesi [Transactions of Proceedings of Turkish Grand National Assembly], Vol. 2, Session: 10. December 19, 1920.
TBMM Zabıt Ceridesi [Transactions of Proceedings of Turkish Grand National Assembly], Vol. 8/1, Session 42. April 20, 1924.
Türkçe’den Başka DillerdeYapılacak Yayınlar Hakkında Kanun [The Law on Publications that will be made in Languages Other than Turkish], no. 2932 (November 1983).
Türkiye’de Yıkıcı ve Bölücü Akımlar [Destructive and Seperatist Movements in Turkey]. Ankara: Kara Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı Yayınları, 1982.
Weaver, Ole. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On security, edited by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, 46‒86. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
Yeğen, Mesut. Müstakbel Türk’ten Sözde Vatandaşa: Cumhuriyet ve Kürtler [From Prospective Turk to So-Called Citizen: Republic and Kurds]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Open Access Policy and Copyright
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
