Kako je TikTok #medreligijski?
Induktivna tematska analiza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2024.465Ključne besede:
medreligijski, medverski, TikTok, tematska analiza, raznovrstnostPovzetek
Avtorica v raziskavi preučuje, kako TikTok omogoča svojim uporabnikom izražanje in izmenjevanje medreligijskih praks ter sodelovanje v njih, pri čemer poudarja sožitje različnih verskih tradicij. Ustvarjalci na tej platformi predstavljajo prizore vsakodnevnega sobivanja, medverske dogodke in mešane obrede, obenem pa razkrivajo diskriminacijo in neodobravanje, povezano z medverskimi odnosi. Na podlagi induktivne tematske analize vsebin je avtorica opredelila tri glavne teme: medverske čustvene odnose (67,9 %), medreligijske izkušnje (21,8 %) ter medreligijska dejstva in informacije (10,3 %).
Raziskava kaže, da TikTok deluje kot prostor za samopredstavitev in medreligijsko povezovanje prek ključnikov #medreligijski in #medverski, s čimer presega vlogo zgolj odmevne komore in povečuje prepoznavnost medreligijskih vsebin. Ustvarjanje verskih vsebin na TikToku materializira vero in širi interakcijo med posameznikom, skupnostjo in Svetim v globalno okolje, kjer se verske prakse izmenjujejo in na novo tolmačijo.
Literatura
Abidin, Crystal. “Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours.” Cultural Science Journal 12, no. 1 (2021): 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2006): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, no. 3 (2020): 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
Byrne, David. “A Worked Example of Braun and Clarke’s Approach to Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Quality & Quantity 56 (2022): 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y.
Campbell, Heidi A. “Religion and the Internet: A Microcosm for Studying Internet Trends and Implications.” New Media & Society 15, no. 5 (2013): 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462848.
Civila, Sabina, Mónica Bonilla-del-Rio, and Ignacio Aguaded. “Social Media and Otherness: The Case of #Islamterrorism on TikTok. “Politics and Governance 11, no. 2 (2023): 114-126. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6299.
Datareportal. “Global Digital Insights.” Accesed April 5, 2024. https://datareportal.com/.
Dicks, Bella. “Multimodal Analysis.” In Sage Research Methods Foundations, edited by Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W. Sakshaug, and Richard A. Williams. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2019. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831970.
Eddy, Kirsten. “How Young People Consume News and the Implications for Mainstream Media.” Reuters Institute. 2022. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/how-young-people-consume-news-and-implications-mainstream-media.
Eysenbach, Gunther, and James E. Till. “Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research on Internet Communities.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 323 (2001): 1103–1105.
Fannin, Rebecca. “The Strategy Behind TikTok’s Global Rise.” Harvard Business Review, September 11, 2019. https://hbr.org/2019/09/the-strategy-behind-tiktoks-global-rise.
Hamm, Margaret, and Kate Hoeting. “#ChristianCheck: TikTok and the Construction of Generation Z Faith.” Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture 12, no. 1 (2023): 5–29.
Herrick, Shannon S. C., Laura Hallward, and Lindsay R. Duncan. “This Is Just How I Cope: An Inductive Thematic Analysis of Eating Disorder Recovery Content Created and Shared on TikTok Using #EDrecovery.” International Journal of Eating Disorders 54, no. 4 (2020): 516-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23463.
Hollenbaugh, Erin E. “Self-Presentation in Social Media: Review and Research Opportunities.” Review of Communication Research 9 (2021): 80-98.
Marynak, Kristy L., Meagan O. Robichaud, Tyler Puryear, Ryan D. Kennedy, and Meghan B. Moran. “#Nicotineaddiction on TikTok: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Top-Viewed Posts.” Tobacco Induced Diseases 20, no. 69 (2022): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/151868.
Masur, Philipp K., DiFranzo, Dominic, and Natalya N. Bazarova. “Behavioral Contagion on Social Media: Effects of Social Norms, Design Interventions, and Critical Media Literacy on Self-Disclosure.” PLoS ONE 16, no. 7 (2021): e0254670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254670.
Miller, Chris. “How Modern Witches Enchant TikTok: Intersections of Digital, Consumer, and Material Culture(s) on #WitchTok.” Religions 13, no. 2 (2022): 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020118.
Morgan, David. “The Material Culture of Lived Religions: Visuality and Embodiment.” Originally published in Mind and Matter: Selected Papers of Nordic Conference 2009. Studies in Art History, vol. 41. Helsinki: Society of Art History, 2010. Republished in The Jugaad Project, July 7, 2019. https://www.thejugaadproject.pub/home/the-material-culture-of-lived-religions-visuality-and-embodiment.
Neumaier, Anna, and Gritt Klinkhammer. Interreligious contact and media: introduction, Religions 50, no. 3 (2020): 321-335.
Statista. “Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2024, by number of monthly active users.” Accessed May 1, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/.
Zhao, Hongying, and Christian Wagner. “How TikTok leads users to flow experience: Investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators.” Internet Research 33, no. 2 (2022): 820-849. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2021-0595.
Zhao, Zhengwei. “Analysis on the ‘Douyin (Tiktok) Mania Phenomenon Based on Recommendation Algorithms.” E3S Web of Conferences, February 3, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123503029.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2024 Aída Velasco Morla
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Open Access Policy and Copyright
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
