Sanjanje z UI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2023.418Ključne besede:
sanje, razlaga sanj, umetna inteligenca, generativna umetna inteligenca, psihoanaliza, etikaPovzetek
Avtor osvetljuje zmožnosti sodobnih sistemov generativne umetne inteligence (UI) na primeru splošno razširjenih in dostopnih modelov ChatGPT za izpopolnjevanje besedil podjetja OpenAI, pri čemer se osredotoča na vprašanje, kako bi tovrstne modele lahko uporabili za analiziranje in beleženje sanj. Začne s kratkim pregledom narave sanj, metod interpretiranja sanj ter pomena odnosa med človekom in sanjami, nato raziskuje, kako se tehnologija, zlasti UI, umešča v ta prostor in kako nam lahko pomaga razumeti sanje. Od preprostih razlag sanj napreduje do interpretacij po različnih filozofskih šolah, nadaljuje z razlago simbolov v okviru posameznih sanj in zaključi z analizo vzorcev v posameznih dnevnikih sanj. Članek zaokroži z razpravo o etičnih vprašanjih, povezanih z UI in sanjami, ter ponudi vpoglede v pretekle tehnološke revolucije, tako v njihove pozitivne kot negativne vplive na človeška prizadevanja. V zaključku predstavi praktično, stvarno in optimistično vizijo bodočega napredka tega področja, utemeljeno v eksperimentih in metodologijah, raziskanih v pričujočem članku
Literatura
Brown, Tom B., Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan et al. “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners.” ArXiv:2005.14165 Computer Science (June 2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165.
Bulkeley, Kelly. “Baseline Survey.” Sleep and Dream Database. Accessed November 24, 2023. https://sleepanddreamdatabase.org/search_results/%7B%22surveyIds%22:[%224bd8d2cd-d69d-4b4a-b225-81d6f2a80a69%22],%22surveyNames%22:[%22Baseline%20Survey%22]%7D.
Bulkeley, Kelly. An Introduction to the Psychology of Dreaming. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1997.
Bulkeley, Kelly. Dreaming in the World’s Religions: A Comparative History. New York: New York University Press, 2008.
Cartelli, Antonio, Luisa Miglio, and Marco Palma. “New Technologies and New Paradigms in Historical Research.” Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 4 (2001): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.28945/559.
Corrigan, Patrick. “How Stigma Interferes with Mental Health Care.” American Psychologist 59, no. 7 (2004): 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.614.
DreamApp Ltd. DreamApp: Journal & Dictionary. Version 5.37.13. Google Play Store. Released November 8, 2023.
Freud, Sigmund. The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated by A. A. Brill. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1918.
Giles, Jim. “Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head.” Nature 438, no. 7070 (December 2005): 900–901. https://doi.org/10.1038/438900a.
Gutman Mušič, Maja, Kelly Bulkeley, Sheldon Juncker, Dan Kennedy, Gez Quinn, and Jennifer Marie Lane. “Theoretical Foundations.” In Maja Gutman Mušič et al., 2020 Dreams: Toward a New Understanding of the Dreaming-Waking Continuum. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2023. Accessed November 24, 2023. https://2020dreams.supdigital.org/2d/theoretical-foundations.
Jones, Jeffrey M. “In U.S., 47% Identify as Religious, 33% as Spiritual.” Gallup, September 22, 2023. https://news.gallup.com/poll/511133/identify-religious-spiritual.aspx.
Juncker, Sheldon, Daniel Kennedy, and Gez Quinn. Elsewhere. Version 3.7.5. Google Play Store. Released November 16, 2023.
Kräenbring, Jona, Tika Monzon Penza, Joanna Gutmann, Susanne Muehlich, Oliver Zolk, Leszek Wojnowski, Renke Maas, Stefan Engelhardt, and Antonio Sarikas. “Accuracy and Completeness of Drug Information in Wikipedia: A Comparison with Standard Textbooks of Pharmacology.” PloS One 9, no. 9 (September 2014): e106930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106930.
McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962.
Mohr, David C., Stacey L. Hart, Isa Howard, Laura Julian, Lea Vella, Claudine Catledge, and Mitchell D. Feldman. “Barriers to Psychotherapy among Depressed and Nondepressed Primary Care Patients.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine 32, no. 3 (1 December 2006): 254–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3203_12.
Moore, David W. “Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal.” Gallup. June 16, 2005. https://news.gallup.com/poll/16915/three-four-americans-believe-paranormal.aspx.
Newton-Rex, Ed. “59 Impressive Things Artificial Intelligence Can Do Today.” Business Insider, March 7, 2017. https://www.businessinsider.com/artificial-intelligence-ai-most-impressive-achievements-2017-3.
Oniri Inc. Oniri - Explore your dreams. Version 1.26. Google Play Store. Released November 9, 2023.
Peeters, Marieke M. M., Jurriaan van Diggelen, Karel van den Bosch, Adelbert Bronkhorst, Mark A. Neerincx, Jan Maarten Schraagen, and Stephan Raaijmakers. “Hybrid Collective Intelligence in a Human–AI Society.” AI & SOCIETY 36, no. 1 (March 2021): 217–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01005-y.
Postman, Neil. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin Books, 2006.
Reavley, Nicola J., Andrew James Mackinnon, Amy J. Morgan, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Sarah Elisabeth Hetrick, Eoin Killackey, Barnaby Nelson, Rosemary Purcell, Marie Bee Hui Yap, Anthony F. Jorm. “Quality of Information Sources about Mental Disorders: a Comparison of Wikipedia with Centrally Controlled Web and Printed Sources.” Psychological Medicine 42, no. 8 (2012): 1753–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171100287X.
Winkelman, Michael, and Ben Sessa, eds. Advances in Psychedelic Medicine: State-of-the-Art Therapeutic applications. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331321003_Advances_in_Psychedelic_Medicine_STATE-OF-THE-ART_THERAPEUTIC_APPLICATIONS.
Xavier, Marlon. “Dream Interpretation in Jung’s Theory A Comparative Analysis.” The Jung Page. October 27, 2013. https://jungpage.org/learn/articles/analytical-psychology/107-dream-interpretation-in-jungs-theory-a-comparative-analysis.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Open Access Policy and Copyright
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
