Sanjanje v digitalni dobi

razmišljanje o tehnološkem pharmakonu

Avtorji

  • Victor J. Krebs

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2023.404

Ključne besede:

digitalna doba, sanjanje, Bion, Stiegler, pharmakon, filozofija, psihoanaliza

Povzetek

Avtor v članku raziskuje enega od načinov razumevanja, kako digitalni mediji vplivajo na človekovo sposobnost razlikovanja med resničnostjo in domišljijo, in sicer skozi interpretacijo diagnoze aktualne kulturne krize, ki jo je postavil Bernard Stiegler, ter z obravnavo teorije sanj Wilfreda Biona. Osrednja premisa članka je, da tehnološki pharmakon, njegovo hkratno škodljivo in terapevtsko naravo (konkretno v digitaliziranem avdiovizualnem komuniciranju) lahko razumemo v smislu Bionove definicije sanjanja, tj. kot trgovanja med zavestjo in nezavednim (ki je odgovorno za spontanost, inventivnost in ustroj pomena), ki ga ureja »funkcija alfa«. Razumevanje, kako digitalno vpliva na našo sposobnost sanjanja, je orožje, s katerim lahko izničimo njegovo škodljivost in premagamo tanatični vzgib, ki ga v nas sproži moč tehnologije.

Binokularna perspektiva ‒ ki hkrati zajema Stiglerjev pogled na človeško tehnološko ali »organološko« evolucijo in Bionov pogled na ustroj resničnosti v sanjah ‒ nam omogoča jasneje videti, kako bi morali prilagoditi svoje tehnološke težnje v izogib temu, da bi nam pharmakon pokvaril psihično funkcijo, ki jo potrebujemo za ločevanje iluzije od stvarnosti. V zagovor svoje trditve avtor v sklepnem delu prispevka ponudi razlago o algoritemskih učinkih na živo domišljijo

Literatura

Asma, Stephen. The Evolution of Imagination. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 2017.

Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007. Kindle.

Benjamin, Walter. One Way Street and other Writings. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1979.

Bion, Wilfred. Learning from Experience. London: Karnac Books, 1984.

Bion, Wilfred. Cogitations. London: Karnac Books, 1992.

Frankel, Richard, and Victor J. Krebs. Human Virtuality and Digital Life. Philosophical and Psychoanalytic Investigations. London & New York: Routledge, 2022.

Grotstein, James S. “‘We Are Such Stuff as Dreams Are Made On’– Annotations on Dreams and Dreaming in Bion’s Works”, in: Dreams in Group Psychotherapy. Theory and Technique, edited by Claudio Neri, Malcolm Pines and Robi Friedman, 110–146. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002.

Grotstein, James. “Dreaming as a ‘curtain of illusion’: Revisiting the ‘royal road’ with Bion as our guide.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 90, no. 4 (2009): 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00155.x.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. New York: MacMillan, 1965.

Ogden, Thomas. “This art of Psychoanalysis. Dreaming Undreamt Dreams and Interrupted Cries.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85, no. 4 (2004): 857–877. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970010.

Olma, Sebastian. In Defence of Serendipity. For a Radical Politics of Innovation. New York: Random House, 2016.

Roberts, Ben. “Cinema as mnemotechnics: Bernard Stiegler and the industrialisation of memory.” Angelaki 11, no. 1 (2006): 55–63, https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250600797864.

Ross, Daniel. “Politics, Terror and Traumatypical Imagery”, In Trauma, History, Philosophy, edited by Matthew Sharpe, Murray Noonan, and Jason Freddi, 230–46. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007.

Ross, Daniel. “For a Neganthropology of the Cinematic.” Academia. August 19, 2015. https://www.academia.edu/15142703/For_a_Neganthropology_of_the_Cinematic_2015/.

Ross, Daniel. “A Summary of Bernard Stiegler, Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus.” Academia. August 23, 2019. https://www.academia.edu/20136235/A_Summary_of_Bernard_Stiegler_Technics_and_Time_1.

Ross, Daniel. Psychopolitical Anaphylaxis: Steps towards a Metacosmos. London: Open Humanities Press, 2021.

Sandler, Paulo. The Language of Bion: A Dictionary of Concepts. New York and London: Routledge, 2010.

Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Translated by Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.

Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and Time, 3. Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.

Stiegler, Bernard. What Makes Life Worth Living. On Pharmacology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.

Stiegler, Bernard. Automatic Society, Volume 1. The Future of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. Kindle.

Stiegler, Bernard. The Neganthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press, 2018.

Stiegler, Bernard. The Age of Disruption. Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2019.

Stiegler, Bernard “Anamnesis and Hypomnesis.” Ars Industrialis. Accessed October 16, 2023. https://arsindustrialis.org/anamnesis-and-hypomnesis.

Venn, Couze, Roy Boyne, John W.P. Phillips, and Ryan Bishop, “Technics, Media, Teleology: Interview with Bernard Stiegler,” Theory, Culture & Society 24, no. 7–8 (2007): 335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407086403.

Objavljeno

2023-12-20

Kako citirati

Krebs, Victor J. 2023. „Sanjanje V Digitalni Dobi: Razmišljanje O tehnološkem Pharmakonu“. Poligrafi 28 (109/110):59-82. https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2023.404.