Animistični način: sodobno poganstvo in posthumano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2021.293Ključne besede:
posthumanizem, novopoganstvo, animizem, čaščenje naravePovzetek
Avtorica skuša v članku raziskati podobnosti med sodobnim poganstvom in posthumanim projektom v tem, kako pristopata do nečloveškega naravnega sveta. Po eni strani posthumanizem odkriva nove načine pojmovanja ideje človeka in njegove povezanosti z nečloveškim svetom. Po drugi strani pa novopoganstvo s svojo animistično odnosnostno senzibilnostjo to razmišljanje širi v domeno duhovnosti. Obe perspektivi izpodbijata moderno paradigmo, v kateri sta si narava in človek nasprotna in medsebojno nepovezana. Namesto nje predlagata odnosnostno ontologijo, ki sprejema »drugačnega drugega«. Ta celostni odnos med človekom in »vsem, kar ni človek«, je mogoče razumeti skozi semiotično chóro, pojem, ki ga je vpeljala Julia Kristeva in v katerem subjekt ni simbolno ločen od sveta, v katerega je zajet.
Literatura
Abram, David. “Magic, Animism, and the Shaman’s Craft.” In The Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature, edited by Bron R. Taylor and Jeffrey Kaplan, vol. 1, 1023‒1026. London: Thoemmes Continuum, 2005.
Abram, David. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. New York: Vintage Books, 1997.
Adler, Margot. Drawing Down the Moon: Witches, Druids, Goddess-Worshippers, and Other Pagans in America. Boston: Beacon Press, 1986.
Andrejč, Gorazd. From Existential Feelings to Belief in God. PhD diss., University of Exeter, 2012.
Aretoulakis, Emmanouil. “Towards a Posthumanist Ecology: Nature without Humanity in Wordsworth and Shelley.” In European Posthumanism, edited by Stefan Herbrechter, Ivan Callus, and Manuela Rossini, 70‒88. London: Routledge, 2016.
Arthur, Shawn. “Technophilia and Nature Religion: The Growth of a Paradox.” Religion 32, no. 4 (2002): 303‒314. https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.2002.0407.
Bird-David, Nurit. “‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology.” Current Anthropology 40 (S1, 1999): 77‒79.
Braidotti, Rosi. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.
Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
Rosi Braidotti, “Posthuman Knowledge,” Harvard GSD, March 13, 2019, 15:40‒15:52. https://youtu.be/0CewnVzOg5w.
Butler, Jenny. “Neo-Pagan Ritual Practice as Visual Culture and Creative Expression of Identity.” In Communicating Cultures, edited by Ullrich Kockel and Máiréad Nic Craith, 107–128. London: LIT Verlag, 2004.
Davis, Erik. TechGnosis: Myth, Magic, and Mysticism in the Age of Information. North Atlantic Books: London 2015.
Davidsen, Markus. “Review Essay: What Is Wrong with Pagan Studies.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 24 (2012): 183‒199. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X634881.
Descola, Philippe. “Modes of Being and Forms of Predication.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4, no. 1 (2014), 271‒280. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.012.
Durkheim, Émile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press, 1915.
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Orlando: Harcourt, 1959.
Fox, Selena, “I’m a Pagan.” Circle Sanctuary. Accessed August 12, 2021. https://www.circlesanctuary.org/index.php/about-paganism/i-am-pagan.
Ferrando, Francesca, “Humans Have Always Been Posthuman: A Spiritual Genealogy of Posthumanism.” In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, edited by Banerji Debashish and Paranjape Makarand, 243‒256. New Delhi: Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_15.
Harvey, Graham. Animism: Respecting the Living World. London: Wakefield Press, 2005.
Harvey, Graham. “Animist Paganism.” In Handbook of Contemporary Paganism, edited by Murphy Pizza and James R. Lewis, 393–412. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Hayles, Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Kristeva, Julia. Semiotica 1. Madrid: Fundamentos, 1978.
Kristeva, Julia. “Revolution in Poetic Language.” In The Portable Kristeva, edited by Kelly Oliver, 27‒92. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
Luhrmann, Tanya Marie. Persuasions of the Witch’s Craft: Ritual Magic in Contemporary England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: The Humanities Press, 1962.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
Murphy Pizza and James R. Lewis, eds., Handbook of Contemporary Paganism. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Oliver, Kelly, ed., The Portable Kristeva. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
Rappaport, Roy. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Starhawk, The Spiral Dance: A Rebirth of the Ancient Religion of the Great Goddess. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1979.
Swancutt, Katherine Anne. “Animism.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1‒17 (Cambridge, 2019). http://doi.org/10.29164/19anim.
Tylor, Edward. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. London: Murray, 1871.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3, 1998): 469‒488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157.
Williams, Liz. Miracles of Our Own Making. London: Reaktion Books, 2020.
Williams, Liz. “Paganism, Part 1: What Is Modern Paganism?.” The Guardian, July 15, 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/15/what-is-modern-paganism.
Wilson, Monica. “Nyakyusa Ritual and Symbolism.” American Anthropologist 56 (2, 1954), 228‒241. https://www.jstor.org/stable/664361.
Wolfe, Cary. What Is Posthumanism?. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
York, Michael. “Pagan Theology.” In Handbook of Contemporary Paganism, edited by Murphy Pizza and James R. Lewis, 283–310. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Verbeek, Peter P. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 2013.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Open Access Policy and Copyright
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
