The Precarious Relationship Between Embodiment and Digital Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2024.459Keywords:
embodiment, disembodiment, phenomenology, digital religionAbstract
This article presents a critique of the prevalent notion that the digital realm is characterized by a condition of disembodiment and excarnation. In order to substantiate its argument, this article initially presents an example of the discourse surrounding the disembodiment thesis, namely Richard Kearney’s considerations of touch in the digital age. In this context, the article uncovers a dominant discursive framing of harmonization vs. over-problematization. It then proceeds to examine the work of Thomas Fuchs and his phenomenological critique of virtuality, which also emphasizes the aspect of disembodiment. Lucy Osler presents a counterargument to the thesis of disembodiment, simultaneously contributing to both phenomenological and embodiment research. Following Osler, this article argues that embodiment is inherently precarious and that the digital sphere requires a theory of multiple modes of embodiment rather than the creation of a dichotomy between embodiment and the digital. The article concludes with some theoretical considerations of digital religion and theological reflections on the possibility of an online Eucharist, a topic that was prevalent in Christian theology during the COVID-19 pandemic.
References
Aagaard, Jesper. “On the dynamics of Zoom fatigue.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 28, no. 6 (2022): 1878–1891. https://doi.org /10.1177/13548565221099711.
Ahmed, Sara. “A phenomenology of whiteness.” Feminist Theory 8, no. 2 (2007): 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700107078139.
Bail, Chris. Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.
Boehm, Gottfried. “Zu einer Hermeneutik des Bildes.” In: Die Hermeneutik und die Wissenschaften, edited by Hans-Georg Gadamer and Gottfried Boehm, 444–447. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1978.
Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso, 2004.
Carroll, Noël. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. London: Blackwell, 2007.
Chalmers, David. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. Allen Lane, 2022.
Ekdahl, David and Lucy Osler. “Expressive Avatars: Vitality in Virtual Worlds.” Philosophy & Technology 36, no. 24 (2023), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00628-5.
Fuchs, Thomas. “The Virtual Other: Empathy in the Age of Virtuality.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 21, no. 5–6 (2014), 157–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898197.003.0004.
Fuchs, Thomas. In Defense of the Human Being: Foundational Questions of an Embodied Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898197.001.0001.
Gallagher, Shaun. “Direct Perception in the Intersubjective Context.” Consciousness and Cognition 17 (2008), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003.
Hepp, Andreas. Deep Mediatization. London/New York: Routledge, 2020.
Kearney, Richard. Touch: Revovering Our Most Vital Sense. New York: Columbia University Press, 2021.
Krueger, Joel and Lucy Osler. “Engineering Affect: Emotion Regulation, the Internet, and the Techno-Social Niche.” Philosophical Topics 47, no. 2 (Fall 2019), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201947223.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Fall of Sleep. New York: Fordham University Press, 2007.
Osler, Lucy. “Taking Empathy Online.” Inquiry 67, no. 1 (2021), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1899045.
Osler, Lucy and Dan Zahavi. “Sociality and Embodiment: Online Communication During and After Covid-19.” Foundations of Science 28 (2023), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09861-1.
Parnas, Josef. “Self and Schizophrenia: A Phenomenological Perspective.” In The Self in Neuroscience and Psychiatry, edited by Tilo Kircher and Anthony David, 217–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543708.012.
Radde-Antweiler, Kerstin, “Embodiment.” In Digital Religion Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media, 2nd edition, edited by Heid A. Campbell and Ruth Tsuria, 103–119. London/New York: Routledge, 2022.
Staudigl, Michael. “Towards a Relational Phenomenology of Violence.” Human Studies 36 (2013), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9269-x.
Staudigl, Michael. “Racism: On the phenomenology of embodied desocialization.” Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2011), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9206-5.
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007.
van Oorschot, Frederike. “Digitales Abendmahl: Präsenzen und Absenzen.” In Coronafolgenforschung, edited by Benjamin Held, Thomas Kirchhoff, Frederike van Oorschot, Philipp Stoellger, Ines-Jacqueline Werkner, 97–122. Heidelberg: Universitätsbibliothek heiBOOKS, 2022.
Zahavi, Dan. “Empathy and Direct Social Perception: A Phenomenological Proposal.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2011), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0070-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tobias Friesen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy and Copyright
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
