ON THE VALIDITY OF MEASUREMENT IN KINESIOMETRICS CONTEXT

Authors

  • Franjo Prot University of Zagreb Faculty of Kinesiology

Abstract

Kinesiometrics is a scientific discipline which deals with problems of measurement in kinesiology, with the development of new theoretical and applied measurement models and with practical procedures in the field of the measurement of behavior relevant to kinesiology. In this document, contribution validity (one of the most important concepts) is systemized and organized from the general bird’s-eye view, taking into the account the psychometric heritage and kinesiometric experience. In the first step we recognize the traditional separation of validities into two major groups, i.e. as validities a priori (in psychometrics aprioristic validities) and validities a posteriori. These two groups are further splitted and divided into several groups and up to four levels, up to the point where concrete data analysis methods and techniques could be recognized for its determination. To be able to recognize most of the problems encountered in grasping validity in its diversity acceptable systematization would be of great help.

References

Anić, V., & Goldstein, I. (1999). Rječnik stranih riječi. Zagreb: Naklada NOVI LIBER.

Anić, V., & Goldstein, I. (2002). Hrvatski Enciklopedijski Rječnik. Zagreb: Naklada NOVI LIBER.

Bosnar, K., Prot, F., & Momirović, K. (1984). Neke relacije između kanoničke i kvazikanoničke korelacijske analize. (In Momirović, K., Štalec, J., Prot, F., Bosnar,K., Viskić-Štalec, N,. Pavičić, L., & Dobrić, V. Kompjuterski programi za klasifikaciju, selekciju, programiranje i kontrolu treninga) (p.5-22). Fakultet za fizičku kulturu, Zagreb.

Bujas, Z. (1954). Psihofiziologija rada. Zagreb: JAZU.

Bujas, Z. (1981). Uvod u metode eksperimentalne psihologije. Treće izdanje. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983, 2003). Appendix 4. Set correlation as a General Multivariate Data-Analytic Method. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 487-518.

Cronbach, J.L. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Ferligoj, A., Leskošek, K., & Kogovšek, T. (1995). Zanesljivost in veljavnost merjenja. Metodološki zveski 11. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede.

Gliner, J.A., & Morgan, G.A. (2000). Research Methods in Applied Settings: An Integrated Approach to Design and Analysis. Mahawah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Guilford, J.P. (1954). Psychometric methods. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

Guliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental test. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Hayashi, C. (1980). Quantification of Qualitative data –Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data. Actes de la journee de travail Procédions of Analyse des donnes Naples 30 jun au 5 julliet 1980. INRIA.

Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variants. Biometrika, 28, 321-377.

Hošek, A., Bosnar, K., & Prot, F. (1984). Comparison of the results of quasicanonical and canonical correlation analysis in various experimental situations. In Lužar, V & Cvitaš, M. (Eds.): Proceedings of the International Symposium 'Computer at the University', Zagreb:University Computing Centre, 610.1-610.7.

Jones, L, & Tissen, D. (2007). A History and Overview of Psychometric. In Rao, C.R., & Sinharay, S. (Eds.). Handbook of statistics 26. Psychometrics. North Holland: 1-22.

Kingston, N. (2007). Future Changes to Psychometrics: Validity, Validity , Validity. In Rao C.R., Sinharay S. (Editors) Handbook of Statistics 26. Psychometrics. North Holland: 1111-1112.

Knežević, G., & Momirović, K. (1996). Algorithm and program for analysis of relations between canonical correlation analysis and covariance canonical analysis. [ Algoritam i program za analizu relacija kanoničke korelacijske analize i kanoničke analize kovarijansi in Serbian] In Kostić, P. (Eds.) Merenje u psihologiji, 2, 57-73. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.

Lord, F.M., & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical theory of mental test scores. NewYork: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Mekota, K., & Blahuš P. (1983). Motoricke testy v telesne vychove. Praha: Statni pedagogicke nakladatelstvo.

Momirović, K. (1966). Valjanost. U Krković A., Momirović K. i Petz B. (1966): Odabrana poglavlja iz psihometrije i neparametrijske statistike. Zagreb: Društvo psihologa Hrvatske, 55-97.

Momirović, K. (1971). Jednostavna metoda za kvazikanoničku validaciju psihologijskih mjernih instrumena. Kineziologija 1,1,1:91-93.

Momirović, K. (1971). Primijenjena kineziologija. Kratki kurs iz kineziometrije. Stenogram audiozapisa predavanja iz kineziometrije. Zagreb.

Momirović, K., Štalec, J., & Zakrajšek, E. (1973). Primjena generaliziranih image transformacija u analizi relacija skupova varijabli. Kineziologija, 3, 2:45-56.

Momirović, K., & Gredelj, M. (1980). Primjena elektroničkih računala u određivanju metrijskih karakteristika i izračunavanju testovnih rezultata. Zagreb: Društvo psihologa Hrvatske.

Momirović, K., Dobrić, V., & Karaman, Ž. (1983). Canonical covariance analysis. In: the Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium 'Computer at the University', Cavtat, 463-473.

Momirović, K., Štalec, J., Prot, F., Bosnar, K., Pavičić, L., Viskić-Štalec, N., & Dobrić, V. (1984). Kompjuterski programi za klasifikaciju, selekciju, programiranje i kontrolu treninga. Zagreb: Fakultet za fizičku kulturu Sveučilišta u Zagrebu

Momirović, K., Wolf, B., Džamonja, Z., & Hošek, A. (1993). Psihoticizam kod dece: Teorija i merenje. Beograd: Savez društava psihologa Srbije.

Momirović, K., Bogdanović, M., Tenjović, L., & Wolf, B. (1994). The most predictable and reliable criterion. Psihologija (Psychology), 27, 1-2:11-23.

Momirović, K., Wolf, B., & Popović, D. (1999). Uvod u teoriju merenja. I. Metrijske karakteristike kompozitnih mernih instrumenata. [Introduction to the theory of measuring, I. Metric characteristics of composite measurement instruments. In Serbian]. Priština: Univerzitet u Prištini.

Prot, F. (2008). Research Methodology in Zagreb Kinesiology Circle. Proceedings book of 5th International Scientific Conference on Kinesiology "KINESIOLOGY RESEARCH TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS" (p. 881-672) September 10-14, 2008, Zagreb, Croatia. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of kinesiology.

Radosavljević, R.P. (1908,1909). Uvod u eksperimentalnu psihologiju I-II. Zagreb: Hrv. Pedagoško književni zbor.

Radosavljević, R.P. (1910). Uvod u eksperimentalnu pedagogiju. Zagreb: Hrv. Pedagoško književni zbor.

Rowe, A.D., & Matew, T.M. (2006). Validity. in Wood, M. Terry & Weimo Zhu (eds.) (2006): Measurement theory and practice in kinesiology. Human kinetiscs, Champain, IL.

Tucker, L.R. (1958). An Inter-Battery Method of Factor Analysis, Psychometrika, 23,2: 111-136.

Wainer, H., & Brown, I.H. (eds.). (1988). Test Validity. Hillsdale, N.Y: Lawrence Eribaum Association inc. (LEA).

Wood, M.T., & Zhu, W. (eds.). (2006). Measurement theory and practice in kinesiology. Human kinetiscs, Champain, IL.

Zhu, W., & Venter, A. (2006). Analyzing Vary Large or Very Small Data Sets. In Wood, M. Terry & Zhu, W. (eds.). (2006). Measurement theory and practice in kinesiology. Human kinetics, Champain, IL.

Zumbo, D.B. (2007). Validity; Fundamental Issues and Statistical Methodology. In Rao C.R., Sinharay S. (Eds). Handbook of Statistics 26. Psychometrics. North Holland: 45-80.

*** (1984). Kineziometrija. Sportski leksikon. Zagreb: Jlz „Miroslav Kreža“: 201.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.) (1999). STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING. American Educational Research Association.

Downloads

Published

24-12-2010

How to Cite

Prot, F. (2010). ON THE VALIDITY OF MEASUREMENT IN KINESIOMETRICS CONTEXT. Annales Kinesiologiae, 1(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.zrs-kp.si/index.php/AK/article/view/70

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

Open Access Policy and Copyright

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors grant the publisher commercial rights to produce hardcopy volumes of the journal for sale to libraries and individuals.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.