IS SPECIFIC MOTOR TEST ENOUGH TO EVALUATE NEW ALPINE SKI KNOWLEDGE IN SKI BEGINNERS?

Authors

  • Vjekoslav Cigrovski University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology

Abstract

The present research aims at determining whether the results of specific motor tests (continuous lateral jumps in dictated tempo − SKILJ) are a sufficient measure to evaluate the level of acquired alpine ski knowledge of ski beginners. Twenty four alpine ski naïve male participants with comparable performance levels and no record of injuries in the preceding six months were included in the study. They were tested on SKILJ test Microgate Optojump Next system prior to participating in a structured alpine ski school program. After completing the ski school program, the participants’ knowledge of short turn was tested by five judges.  Correlation coefficients between the five judges for the short turn element were all high and statistically significant, implying judges’ objectivity in grading alpine ski knowledge. On the other hand, there was no statistically significant correlation between lateral jumps in predefined pace and the acquired knowledge of short turn skiing technique. Therefore, we conclude that the movements executed during alpine skiing with continuous connecting of short parallel turns are much more complicated than the movements needed during the performance of SKILJ which cannot fully depict alpine skiing. 

References

Cigrovski, V., & Matković, B. (2015). Skiing technique carving. Zagreb (CRO): University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology.

Cigrovski, V., Matković, B., & Matković, R. B. (2008). Evaluation of objectivity and homogeneity of skiing knowledge grading process. In: D. Milanović, & F. Prot (Eds.), Proceedings of 5th International Scientific conference on Kinesiology (pp. 513–517). Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology.

Cigrovski, V., Franjko, I., Rupčić, T., Baković, M., & Matković, B. (2016). Correlation between balance, specific alpine skiing knowledge and situational efficiency in alpine skiing. Acta Kinesiologica, 10 Suppl., (1), 66–70.

Gwangjae, Y., Young, J. J., Jinhyeok, K., Jin, Hae, K., Hye, Y. K., Kitae, K., & Siddhartha, B. P. (2016). Potential of IMU sensors in performance analysis of professional alpine skiers. Sensors, 16(4), 463. doi:10.3390/s16040463

Lee, H. T., Kim, Y. J., & Roh, H. L. (2012). Changes in the lower limb joint angle during the simulated skiing. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 24(6), 471–474. doi: 10.1589/jpts.24.471

LeMaster, R. (2009). Applications of physics education research to skiing pedagogy for coaches and instructors. In E. Müller, S. Lindinger, & T. Stöggl (Eds.), Science and Skiing IV (pp. 347–355). Oxford (UK): Meyer & Meyer Sport.

Loland, S. (2009). Alpine skiing technique – practical knowledge and scientific analysis. In E. Müller, S. Lindinger, & T. Stöggl (Eds.), Science and Skiing IV (pp. 43–58). Oxford (UK): Meyer & Meyer Sport.

Malliou, P., Amoutzas, K., Theodosiou, A., Gioftsidou, A., Mantis, K., Pylianidis, T., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2004). Proprioceptive training for learning downhill skiing. Perceptual Motor Skills, 99(1), 149–154. doi: 10.2466/pms.99.1.149-154

Nam, C. H., & Woo, B. H. (2007). Kinematical analysis of up-down motion in ski simulator. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 17(3), 41–49. doi: 10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.3.041

Neumayr, G., Hoertnagl, H., Pfister, R., Koller, A., Eibl, G., & Raas, E. (2003). Physical and physiological factors associated with success in professional alpine skiing. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 24(8), 571–575. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-43270

Nourrit-Lucas, D., Zelic, G., Deschamps, T., Hilpron, M., & Delignières, D. (2013). Persistent coordination patterns in a complex task after 10 years delay: how validate the old saying "once you have learned how to ride a bicycle, you never forget!" Human Movement Science, 32(6), 1365–1378. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.07.005

Oreb, G., Vlašić, J., Cigrovski, V., Prlenda, N., & Radman, I. (2011). Relationship between rhythm and learning alpine skiing technique. In I. Prskalo, & D. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th FIEP European congress “Physical education in the 21st century-pupils competencies” (pp. 640–646). Zagreb: HRKS.

Panizzolo, F. A., Marcolin, G., & Petrone, N. (2013). Comparative evaluation of two skiing simulators as functional training devices for recreational skiers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 12(1), 151–158.

Ružić, L., Rađenović, O., & Tudor, A. (2008). The predictive power of balance board: tests for «on-the-skis» balance performance. In D. Milanović, & F. Prot (Eds.), Proceedings of 5th International Scientific conference on Kinesiology (pp. 196–200). Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology.

Straub, W. F. (1975). Validation of a ski simulator. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 46(1), 92-99. doi: 10.1080/10671315.1975.10615309

Waibel, K., Huber, A., & Spitzenpfell, P. (2009). Performance analyses in alpine ski racing regarding the characters of slopes and course settings. In E. Műller, S. Lindinger, & T. Stoggl (Eds.), Science and skiing IV (pp. 565–572). Oxford (UK): Meyer & Meyer Sport.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2017

How to Cite

Cigrovski, V. (2017). IS SPECIFIC MOTOR TEST ENOUGH TO EVALUATE NEW ALPINE SKI KNOWLEDGE IN SKI BEGINNERS?. Annales Kinesiologiae, 8(1), 5–14. Retrieved from http://ojs.zrs-kp.si/index.php/AK/article/view/133

Issue

Section

Articles